Skip to content

Computation of income from business [Section 29] – Income Tax

Computation of income from business [Section 29] :

(i) According to section 29, the profits and gains of any business or profession are to be computed in accordance with the provisions contained in sections 30 to 43D. It must, however, be remembered that in addition to the specific allowances and deductions stated in sections 30 to 36, the Act further permits allowance of items of expenses under the residuary section 37(1), which extends the allowance to items of business expenditure not covered by sections 30 to 36, where these are allowable according to accepted commercial practices.

(ii) An item of loss or expenditure not falling within any of the express deductions may be allowed if it is deductible on the basis of common principles of commercial expediency. Thus, in determining whether a particular item (other than those covered by sections 30 to 36) is deductible from profits, it is necessary first to enquire whether the deduction is expressly or by necessary implication prohibited by the Act and then, if it is not so prohibited, to consider whether it is of such nature that it should be charged against income in the computation of the “profits and gains of business or profession”. Accordingly, a loss due to embezzlement or theft of cash by an employee during the course of business is allowable as a deduction in computing the business profit, even though they are not covered by any specific provision of the Act. Losses of non-capital nature which are incidental to the trade and arise unexpectedly in the regular course of the business would be allowed as losses incidental to the trade though there is no specified provision in the Act for allowing such deductions. Examples of such losses are embezzlement, theft, robbery or destruction of assets, overdrawing by employees, loss of stock in trade by damage or by fire or by ravages of white ants or by enemy action during war or by negligence or fraud of employees, etc.

(iii) Where a trader stands surety for the debt of another and such guarantee is not in the course of or for the purposes of trade, any payment made as a result of such guarantee cannot be deducted as a business loss except in a case where the contract of guarantee is entered into in the course of business pursuant to a trade or custom of which mutual accommodation is the essence e.g., trader standing surety for one another. Loss of cash in a bank on account of robbery by dacoits or loss through burglary of cash which the assessee is under legal obligation or business necessity required to keep in till it would be allowable as loss incidental to the trade. Losses arising from payments made as advances to employees and money lent by the managed company to the managing agents which had become irrecoverable would be incidental to the business provided that the amounts paid in advance or as loan were so made with reasonable business prudence and hence would be deductible.

(iv) Loss caused by embezzlement is allowable as a deduction not necessarily in the year in which the embezzlement takes place, but when there is no reasonable chance of obtaining restitution and the amount is found to be irrecoverable. Normally when a businessman writes off the amount, it is a prima facie evidence of the fact that the amount has become irrecoverable. If embezzled or stolen moneys which are allowed as deduction in any year are subsequently recovered, they should be brought to tax as a revenue receipt from the business in the year of recovery.

(v) In respect of wasting assets or exhaustion of capital, no deduction is allowable from the income derived from such capital or wasting asset. Accordingly, where an annuity is purchased, the entire amount of annuity received is taxable regardless of the capital paid away and exhausted for the purchase of annuity. Likewise, in the case of a lease, the capital cost of the lease is not allowed to be deducted over the life of the lease.

Leave a Reply