Skip to content

Distinction in law between ‘Seizure’ and ‘Detention’

Distinction in law between ‘Seizure’ and ‘Detention’ :

Denial of access to the owner of the property or the person who possesses the property at a particular point of time by a legal order/notice is called detention. The purpose of detention is to prevent that property being removed or used by the owner of the property or the person who possesses the property for some time. In detention the possession of the property is not taken away by the department, but in seizure the possession is transferred from the owner to the department. The detention order is served when it is not practicable to seize the goods at that particular point of time. Secondly, when it is suspected that the goods are liable to confiscation then detention order is issued. As soon as the ‘suspicion’ is converted into ‘reasonable belief’ after enquiry/ investigation, the detained goods are formally seized because seizure can be made only on the basis of ‘reasonable belief’ that the goods are liable to confiscation. Taking possession by the department is necessary condition of seizure. During the period of seizure, the ownership of the seized goods is suspended till finalisation of the adjudication proceedings. It is to be noted here that no confiscation can be ordered without seizure.

Certain safeguards are provided in section 60 of Model CGST/SGST Law in respect of the power of search or seizure. These are as follows:

i. Seized goods or documents should not be retained beyond the period necessary for their examination;

ii. Photocopies of the documents can be taken by the person from whose custody documents are seized;

iii. For seized goods, if a notice is not issued within sixty days of its seizure, goods shall be returned to the person from whose possession it was seized. This period of sixty days can be extended on justified grounds up to a maximum period of six months;

iv. An inventory of seized goods shall be made by the seizing officer;

v. Certain categories of goods to be specified under Model GST Rules (such as perishable, hazardous etc.) can be disposed of immediately after seizure;

vi. Provisions of Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 relating to search and seizure shall apply. However, one important modification is in relation to sub-section (5) of section 165 of Code of Criminal Procedure – instead of
sending copies of any record made in course of search to the nearest Magistrate empowered to take cognizance of the offence, it has to be sent to the Principal Commissioner/ Commissioner of CGST/ Commissioner of SGST .

Leave a Reply