Skip to content

Revision of Orders prejudicial to the Revenue [Section 263] – Income Tax

Revision of Orders prejudicial to the Revenue [Section 263] :

(i) Under section 263(1), if the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner considers that any order passed by the Assessing Officer is erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, he may, after giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard and after making an enquiry, pass an order enhancing or modifying the assessment made by the Assessing Officer or cancelling the assessment and directing fresh assessment.

(ii) Explanation 2 has been inserted with effect from 1st June, 2015 to provide that an order passed by the Assessing Officer shall be deemed to be erroneous in so far as it is prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue, if, in the opinion of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner,—

(1) the order is passed without making inquiries or verification which should have been made;

(2) the order is passed allowing any relief without inquiring into the claim;

(3) the order has not been made in accordance with any order, direction or instruction issued by the CBDT under section 119;

(4) the order has not been passed in accordance with any decision which is prejudicial to the assessee, rendered by the jurisdictional High Court or Supreme Court in the case of the assessee or any other person.

(iii) The term “record‟ shall include and shall be deemed always to have included all records relating to any proceedings under the Act available at the time of examination by the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner.

(iv) Where any order referred to in section 263(1) passed by the Assessing Officer had been the subject-matter of any appeal, the powers of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under section 263(1) shall extend and shall be deemed always to have extended to such matters as had not been considered and decided in such appeal.

(v) No order shall be made after the expiry of 2 years from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be revised was passed.

(vi) In computing the period of 2 years, the time taken in giving an opportunity to the assessee to be reheard under section 129 and any period during which the revision proceeding is stayed by an order or injunction of any court shall be excluded.

(vii) The time limit, however, does not apply in case where the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has to give effect to a finding or direction contained in the order of the Appellate Tribunal, High Court or the Supreme Court.

Leave a Reply